Religious nut cases are truly claim to a scientific opinion WTF

Religious nut cases are truly claim to a scientific opinion WTF Often with religious beliefs that are very strong in scientific research and any attempt to insist that whatever the outcome may not be contrary to the belief that their God? Recently, this nut case, linear-thinking people have come to an online "Think Tank" says that man is the image of God, and their would be an experiment, once and for all that man is divine and different from all other animals. It states;? Everyone has the freedom and the right to their opinions, truths and beliefs, without discrimination. And 'the hypocritical, arrogant or fanatic? I disagree, as if one takes the belief relation to the observations, research and reality then people in general, names like the hypocrites, arrogant and fanatical. So this is why these concepts exist. In fact, if you deny all the facts and yet with a result that is 180 degrees, you are wrong. And that would have normally because the fanatics [dictionary definition] arrogant [personal characteristics may be], or a hypocrite [in this case, entitled Science and ignore all the data collected, the facts and comments]. The religious nut case religious followers of the doctrine considers;? I have my position and a simple explanation of why I feel so on the genetic transmission of a comparison as scientific evidence that human beings are alike. I have reason to feel this way until they are convinced otherwise, my position on this issue. I can say this without prejudice against you or another person who feels differently. More or less? That was not good with the other Think Tank members of the online think-tank, said,? No, this is wrong. In this number one has already said that the search has nothing to do with what is? Feel? only scientific methods and research. Where you have NO. Only through the scientific method, not a rag or piece of evidence. And in all of your comments have not been able to rebut the evidence that is not a trivial thing quick convictions. Anyone can do it. And later, what I'm saying is your position on this question is irrelevant, as it is wrong. Come on it is not. If you feel un-convinced, without additional evidence, even without reading any of the evidence I have is a personal problem and a problem of the person you need to be addressed. How to find information about me is irrelevant. You are wrong. Unless you can refute the results of all these top researchers presented their 1000? S sources and / or know what the top DNA scientists do not? T know and explain to all that research again what I said earlier, along with DNA testing, then the wind blowing spit wads. And well, I hope we do so at any other place really. And a little '; They each state has a right to their opinion? Of course they are, and freedom of expression, but not the right to researchers, scholars and seekers of truth, if you deny what is right before your eyes. When they are put to the test. But the game of games. Wow, you know, after reading all this discussion, is a wonder that we immediately dismiss all religious followers of all research and scientific work. This seems to be the only way possible to protect the integrity of the forward progression of the species and propulsion systems significant scientific study. Consider all this in 2006. "Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative ideas and unique perspectives, we think with Lance;